And ``my game`` is Halo 1.

You won`t play my game because you`d be terrible at it. Sense of entitlement? ``You guys`` got everything from Halo 3, whereas people like me paid $60 for absolutely nothing. And I bought the ****ing H3 edition 360 on the day of H3`s release, so technically Bungie owes me over $400. Clearly you didn`t watch my video (or the second one) because you would`ve realized that casual play and competitive capacity can coexist with no interference from each other. I didn`t move onto a game that was ``better than Halo 3`` because no other game is LIKE Halo. So when Halo starts to suck, it`s kind of hard to go find something else.

FTwpart46You mad that your dreams got shattered.

this video has my

Well, I just sat through the entire thing and I want my 12 minutes of life back. What a great, great case of false entitlement. Did you notice how there was never any mention of a `correct` example? Sure, the guy cited some positive things about Halo:CE, but nowhere did he make any mention of a game that was better (or better supported) than Halo 2 or 3. Why is it that diehard nerds like this automatically assume they`re entitled be spoon-fed by the game developers, and everyone else should starve because they`re ``casual gamers``? You paid $60 for the game, just like I did (same price as BioShock btw). Why should we get differing levels of support? Why should either of us get more from Bungie than we did from Ubisoft on Rainbow 6: Vegas? That game was the same price as Halo 3.If the game is so ****ty then why did you (obviously) play so much of it? Why didn`t you just move on to a game that`s better than Halo 3? Oh..wait, because one doesn`t exist?Seriously, shut up and learn to play the game the way it was built, with the tools available, and deal with the fact that you`re not an only grandchild. Either that, or go start a development studio and build your own game. I sure as **** won`t play it.